Newell sanders



(Model.) 2

N. SANDERS.

PLOW.

No. 252,972. Patented Jan. 31,1882.

tlwrrnn STATES TATENT @rrtce.

NEWELL SANDERS, OF GHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.

PLOW.

SEECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 252,972, dated January31, 1882. I

Application filed October 6, 1880. (Model.)

To all whom it may concern Be it known that I, NEWELL SANDERS, ofChattanooga, in the county of Hamilton and State of Tennessee, haveinvented a new and useful Improvement in Turning-Flows, whichimprovement is fully set forth in the following specification, referencebeing had to the accompanying drawings.

The object of my invention is to combine the cutter and landside of aturning-plow in one piece in such a way as to have the cutter wellsupported without combining it with the share or mold-board or making anadditional part in the construction of the plow, at the same time havingthe two sides of the cutter in the same general lines with thelandsideand mold-board sides of the plow, all of which is shown in theaccompanying drawings.

Figure l is a general view of a mold-board side of a plow; Fig. 2, ofthe landside side of a plow; and Fig. 3 is a view of the landside withcutter attached. a

A is thelandside. B is the cutter. O is the share. D is the standard,and E is the moldboard.

My invention relates particularly to that class of plows the faces ofwhose cutters correspond to the general curvature of the moldboard andsurface of the landside.

Now, it is found in practice that the heel of the landside is a vitalpoint in a plow and in time wears off, so that a new landside has to beobtained. It is further found that the cutter will last about the samelength of time as the heel ofthe landside. My cutter and landside beingcast in one piece therefore is a great improvement. The cutter adds verylittle extra cost to the landside and has to be renewed only when thelandside requires renewal. It is also stronger and better attached thanany other, resting, as it does, on the front edge of and being bolted attop and bottom securely to the standard. The strain on the cutter whichis in line with the landside is conveyed to that part. It leaves theshare, which needs renewing oftener than any other part, in one piece,entirely separate from any other part. It leaves-no difficultyin the wayof making and using steel shares.

What I claim is- 1. The landside A, having the forward notch, a, and theupward extension, B, the latter havinga sharp cutting-edge, and curvedto be flush with the mold-board and share, and provided with the ear I),substantially as shown and described.

2. The landside A and coltcr-extension B, as described, formed in onepiece, in combination with the mold -,board E, share 0, and standard I),substantially as shown and described.

NEWE LL SANDERS.

Witnesses H. D. GHALT, G. P. RoBnR'rsoN.

